This Pie is out of this World

Mercury

Goethe Pie Tectonic Ghost Craters on Mercury

It’s said that “art imitates life,” but how about baked goods imitating geologic formations!  Strange as it might seem, the MESSENGER spacecraft that has been orbiting the planet Mercury since March, 2011 has discovered unusual groups of ridges and troughs that do just that – imitate a common baked-good, a pie.  Families of extensional troughs or graben revealed by MESSENGER are encircled by contractional wrinkle ridges arranged in circular rings.  This pattern of ridges and troughs resembles the raised edge and cracks in a pie crust. But the analogy with “pie crust” doesn’t stop there. These families of landforms are directly associated with “ghost” craters, impact craters that have been flooded and buried by lava flows. The rim of the buried impact crater concentrates the contractional forces that forms a ridge ring, revealing the outline of the buried crater. So, to complete the analogy the impact crater is the pie pan.  We think the troughs or graben form from cooling and contraction of unusually thick lava flow units, like the custard filling cools in a pumpkin pie. It is the eruption and rapid accumulation of very fluid lava flows into thick cooling units in combination with global contraction from cooling of the interior of the planet that may explain why these families of tectonic landforms in ghost craters on Mercury have not been seen elsewhere in the Solar System.

Dr. Tom Watters is a geologist in the Center for Earth and Planetary Studies at the National Air and Space Museum.

Scratching Beneath the Surface

What’s inside a planet? What instruments do scientists use to figure it out? And what clues does a planet’s surface give us?

On Saturday, April 21, Lisa Walsh and I, scientists from the Museum’s Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, invited visitors to the National Air and Space Museum’s Explore the Universe Family Day to think about these questions, through two hands-on activities relating to our research into tectonics on Mercury. As the MESSENGER (Mercury Surface, Space ENvironment, Geochemistry, and Ranging) spacecraft starts its second Earth year in orbit around Mercury, we interacted with approximately 900 kids and kids-at-heart, asking them to figure out what was inside balloons by using tools analogous to those used in planetary science (scales, magnets, and, slightly less analogously, a good hard shake), and to piece together a puzzle made from images of Mercury’s surface.

Evidently you can’t just do one piece of the puzzle, because often people stuck around until the whole thing was put together, talking with Lisa about MESSENGER results and her own research.

 

explore the universe

Lisa Walsh talks with young visitors about her research during the Explore the Universe Family Day at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, DC on April 21, 2012.

Lisa studies wrinkle ridges, which form on the surface of a planet when rock layers are crunched in from the sides, like scuffing in the edge of a rug with your shoe. This causes the layers to fault and fold, leaving ‘wrinkles’ in the surface. Wrinkle ridges are found throughout the inner Solar System, and have been mapped in greater detail on Mercury during the last year than was possible before the arrival of MESSENGER. Lisa wants to understand why wrinkle ridges on Mercury are so much larger than those on the Earth’s Moon, and what they look like beneath the surface on both planetary bodies.

The balloons were seemingly irresistible, since holding one out to any passing kid and asking them if they wanted to figure out “What’s Inside?” usually resulted in them spending the time to figure out all six, whether with a cohort of siblings or fellow boy scouts, or with a parent as engaged as they were. The balloons separately contained sand, iron filings, yarn, a magnet, a marble, and beads, with the iron filings being the most popular for further investigation. As the afternoon progressed, I frequently interacted again with previous visitors to the table, when they brought back friends or family to check it out.

 

michelle selvans

Dr. Michelle Selvans helps young investigators as they determine the interior materials of balloons, using scales, magnets, and a good shake.

Every participant left the table with something in hand (sticker, button, poster, or a model of MESSENGER to put together at home). But even more gratifying was seeing everyone leave with an appreciation for who studies the planets in our Solar System (we do!), how they’re studied (for example, through missions like MESSENGER, using instruments like the multi-spectral and multi-resolution camera we depend on for our research), and why they’re studied.

Why do we as a species study our neighbors in space? Why do we look for Earth-like planets around neighboring stars (the ongoing Kepler mission)? Why even study our own planet, its life and climate and geology?

If you ask ten people these same questions, you could very well get ten different answers. We all have our own reasons for being interested in the world around us. Maybe we’re concerned about how to protect people from natural hazards like hurricanes or earthquakes. Maybe we want to know if we are ‘alone’ in the universe, or whether life in any form exists elsewhere. Maybe we are awed by the beauty, intricacy, and divinity of the physical universe and just want to commune with it more intimately. Maybe, like for myself, practical, personal, and spiritual reasons all factor in.

 

Mercury

Mosaic of high-resolution MESSENGER images taken at dawn, showing several newly-identified tectonic features (arrows). Made by Dr. Michelle Selvans.

 

I study large faults on Mercury, which cast long shadows at dawn and dusk, so they’re easy to see when we take pictures at those times of (Mercury) day. They’ve been mapped previously all across the surface (using images from before MESSENGER went into orbit), and appear to be placed in a pattern that suggests global-scale stresses. As we collect pictures at dawn and dusk, I am mapping the greater number of scarps that are being revealed, to see if the pattern holds. I also use the elevation maps that other MESSENGER Science Team members are producing, in order to understand the shapes of the most intriguing faults (measured across the scarp). Those shapes will help me model the fault structure below the surface, in order to understand the shallow structure of Mercury’s crust.

That’s a little bit of what I do here in the Center for Earth and Planetary Studies. What would you want to know about Mercury if you were in my place? Or about any other planet in our Solar System, or beyond? Why are you interested in those questions? And how could we go about figuring out the answers?

We would like to thank everyone who participated in the April 21 Family Day fun, as well as the MESSENGER spacecraft Education Team for developing the puzzle, and the Lunar and Planetary Institute Education Team for the inspiration behind the balloon activity (the Investigating the Insides module, on their Explore! website).

Dr. Michelle Selvans is a planetary geophysicist in the Center for Earth and Planetary Studies at the National Air and Space Museum.

Friendship 7’s ‘Fourth Orbit’

The Friendship 7 space capsule was designed to orbit the earth and it did just that on February 20, 1962, with John Glenn, Jr. on board. It circled the globe three times before landing in the Atlantic Ocean. Three months later Friendship 7 began its second mission, or what was popularly referred to as its “fourth orbit:” a worldwide exhibition that was organized to promote and represent the United States and its space program in nearly 30 cities around the world.

 

Sri Lanka

"Friendship 7" arriving at the airport in Ceylon (Sri Lanka), July 1, 1962 (NASM Archives)

 

Five years earlier, popular reaction to the successful launch of Sputnik in 1957 had prompted government officials in the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. to see spaceflight as a leading means for demonstrating power, technological capability, and national values to the world public. As a result, the U.S. space program, and its exhibition abroad, became important instruments in American foreign relations during the Cold War.

Over the course of its three-month-long world tour, Friendship 7 was seen by roughly four million people. Another 20 million people watched television programs about the capsule, which were broadcast from the exhibition sites. In early May 1962, on the first day the capsule was displayed at the Science Museum in London, thousands of people had to be turned away because the huge crowds overtaxed the facilities. In Madrid, the line to see the capsule was often up to a mile long and Spanish authorities had to be called to control a crowd of 40,000 people around the exhibit. Even though tropical thunderstorms drenched Nigeria and an earthquake shook Mexico during the capsule’s visit, the exhibit caused a much larger stir in every city it visited than officials at NASA and the State Department had imagined.

The capsule was flown around the world in a U.S. Air Force cargo plane that was emblazoned with the words “around the world with Friendship 7” and depicted the “fourth orbit” on a map of the four continents that the capsule visited over the summer. A member of NASA’s Cape Canaveral staff accompanied the craft to answer questions from curious audiences around the world.

At its stop in Egypt, the Friendship 7 capsule exhibit convinced skeptics that the flight had really happened. The Washington Post quoted one onlooker who remarked, “I thought this space flight business was a rumor but now [that] I can see the ship I believe it.” It was important for this exhibit visitor, as it was for many spectators around the world, to see the capsule with their own eyes. In the mid-twentieth century, space exploration had just left the realm of science fiction; the extraordinary idea that a man had orbited the earth was made more comprehensible when the craft that had carried Glenn could be seen and touched in person.

Although the Friendship 7 capsule drew record crowds from Paris and Accra, the capsule received its most overwhelming response in Asia. In the middle of July, when the capsule arrived in India, 50,000 Bombay residents waited for up to four hours to see the display at the Brabourne stadium. In the Philippines, priests, students, grandmothers, and boy scouts waded through six inches of rainwater leftover from a typhoon to see the spacecraft during its first day on display.

In Japan, the capsule was taken to Takashimaya, the leading department store in downtown Tokyo, where exhibits were usually mounted. Several hundred police and guides were called in to direct the crowd into a line that climbed nine flights of stairs, zigzagged across the roof of the building, and then descended back down nine flights of stairs to the first floor where the capsule was on display. In the first hour alone more than 12,000 people saw it, while over the course of its four-day visit more than 500,000 people came to the store to see Friendship 7 in person.

When Friendship 7 took its fourth orbit, it was for all practical purposes a defunct piece of machinery. After it landed in the Atlantic Ocean in 1962, the capsule had done what it was designed to do: to orbit the earth. Having outlived its technical utility, its display conveyed not only the fact that the first orbital flight had happened, but also that the American space program was open.

A year after his flight John Glenn wrote to McGeorge Bundy, President Kennedy’s National Security Advisor, that the Friendship 7’s ”fourth orbit” tour, “stressed the fact that [the American space program] was not just a propaganda effort before the world, but a well-thought-out scientific program that could eventually benefit all peoples of the world as the scientific exploration it is.” He went on to note that Russian exhibits highlighted personal appearances of cosmonauts while the United States emphasized scientific information via the capsule’s display. According to Glenn, America’s greatest advantage over the Soviet Union’s space program was “the almost complete freedom to share experiences and new information.” He suggested that the openness of the American program—as represented by the display of the spacecraft—stood in for the nation and its political ideology: when the Friendship 7 capsule was laid bare before the eyes of people from around the world it gave the impression that the U.S. space program was real, benign, apolitical, and designed for the collective benefit of all mankind.

 

Friendship 7

"Friendship 7's" final location, Milestones of Flight gallery, National Air and Space Museum

 

Teasel Muir-Harmony is a visiting researcher at the National Air and Space Museum and a PhD candidate at MIT.