GPS – A Hollywood Actress, a Player Piano, and Hip-Hop

Given the enormous popularity of GPS among civilian users, and the critical applications for the military, it is not surprising that a large body of literature has arisen about the origins of this remarkable technology. The curators of the new Time and Navigation exhibition discuss this history, and we have illustrated it with a few select artifacts, such as the engineering model of the Navy’s NTS-2 satellite, one of the key demonstrators of the technology that led to the deployment of the GPS constellation.

GPS is the result of a collaboration among many contributors. Rather than try to sort out the various claims, I would like to take a closer look at one component of the system, namely the method by which signals from the constellation of satellites are encoded and transmitted to receivers on Earth. The technique is known as “spread spectrum,” and it is widely employed not only by GPS but also by WiFi and Bluetooth wireless connections to computers, by cordless telephones, and by most cell phones in the United States. In fact, spread spectrum and its cousins have created a revolution in communications, which may in a few years relegate traditional narrowband radio to our sister museum, the National Museum of American History.

Hedy Lamarr

Hedy Lamarr

Most histories of GPS credit the US Air Force, correctly, with suggesting this coding scheme for GPS. They also credit the genesis of the idea to the Austrian actress Hedy Lamarr, dubbed by Hollywood producer Louis B. Mayer (of MGM Studios) as “the most beautiful woman in the world” after she emigrated to the U.S. in 1937. I will pass on commenting on her contribution to the cinema, but it is worth exploring just what she did regarding secret coding, and how that relates to GPS.

In 1940, Lamarr met the American avant-garde composer George Antheil, who just returned to America from Paris, where he had created a sensation pushing the boundaries of classical music. Among his more outrageous compositions was one in which he placed a number of player-pianos on the stage, each producing “canned” sounds. For us the relevance of this story is that Lamarr later emigrated to the US and became a fiercely patriotic champion of the Allied cause after America’s entry into World War II in 1941. While living in Austria she had been married to an industrialist named Fritz Mandl, and over dinner conversations he had with his colleagues, she became acquainted with some of the advanced weapons the Nazis would later employ to such great effect. Among them were radio-controlled glide bombs—the predecessors to the “smart bombs” so much in the news today.  Inspired by Antheil’s compositions, she came up with the notion of using perforated paper tape (not as wide as a player-piano roll), to rapidly switch the frequency of the transmitter on a ship that launched the torpedo. An identical tape on the torpedo would switch, or “hop,” the frequency of the receiver, to match the transmitter. Think of a car radio, with which you can rapidly select a radio station by pushing a button, and not twist the tuning dial. The technique depended on the precise synchronization of the two tapes, but for a torpedo that only had to work for a short period of time. And of course it depended on the enemy’s not knowing the sequence of frequency hopping—the sequence had to appear random, although it was not.

Lamar applied for and was granted a patent for a “secret communication system” in 1942, but the Navy did not use her invention. Decades later it was rediscovered and became the basis for secure communications. The paper tapes are now replaced by digital computer circuits, which generate sequences of “pseudo-random numbers” (PRN) that hop the frequencies of the transmitter and receiver in synch. Because the technique requires a wider band of frequencies than a normal radio transmission (think again of the car radio), it is called “spread spectrum,” as it spreads the signal across a wider band.

patent

Patent # 2,292,387 for a “Secret Communication System,” Hedy Kiesler Markey. At the time it was filed, in 1941, Lamarr was married to Gene Markey, a Hollywood screenwriter. She felt that having her married name on the patent would give it more credibility.

Now back to GPS.  GPS uses spread spectrum. It requires a larger bandwidth than a narrowband radio would require to transmit its signals. The satellites transmit primarily on two frequencies, 1575.42 MHz and 1227.60 MHz, but if you tune an ordinary radio scanner to those frequencies, you hear nothing but background noise.  The frequency does not hop, however. The signals are multiplied by a pseudo-random sequence, which is transmitted and recovered by the receivers using the same sequence. There are two main pseudo-random codes, a short one used in civilian receivers, and a longer one used by the military. Like the system proposed by Lamarr, this also spreads the signal out; it also trades bandwidth for power, which is why a normal receiver hears nothing—the signal is well below the noise threshold.  The adoption of this technique gives GPS a number of advantages: the receivers do not need a dish or otherwise large antenna to pick up the signals, and the different codes allow for both civilian and military use of the same system. The low power also means that the signals cannot be received indoors or under dense tree cover, a drawback that future generations of GPS satellites may address.

So if this technique did not come from Hedy Lamarr, where did it come from? Of that we know less. But there are hints that it may have come from another system developed during World War II. If true, that story is every bit as mysterious and intriguing as Lamarr’s. Much of the initial research apparently was done by the cryptographic community and remains classified. But there are some tantalizing hints. A few years ago, The U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) published a pamphlet describing a method of scrambling speech, which was used during World War II by Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt, among others. The NSA claims this “SIGSALY” system was “The Start of the Digital Revolution.”[1] For an agency known for its reticence, this publication represented a major revelation. The invention introduced pseudo-random noise, which was recorded mechanically on a phonograph disk, and superimposed this on the speech channels.  At the other end an identical disk, synchronized to start at the exact same moment, subtracted the noise. The disks were destroyed after each use.  The system was installed in several locations by 1943, including one in the Pentagon and one at Churchhill’s command post under the Admiralty Building near Number 10 Downing Street.

SIGSALY

A SIGSALY installation, ca. 1943, in an undisclosed location. Note the twin turntables, which allowed rapid switching from one recording to another. The recordings contained random noise generated by mercury-vapor vacuum tubes. The noise was injected into the signal at the transmitting site, while at the receiving site, an identical recording, playing in perfect synchronization, subtracted the noise, revealing the voices of FDR, Churchill, and others

Grandmaster Flash

Grandmaster Flash (Joseph Saddler), hip-hop pioneer and inductee into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. His creative use of twin turntables, with a switch he developed to alternate between the two, has been credited as a seminal moment in the creation of hip-hop music.

The NSA pamphlet shows a system of two phonographs, each of which contained one of the platters. For some of us, seeing this photograph immediately evokes another phenomenon—the use of twin turntables by hip-hop musicians to sample and otherwise electronically alter sounds on the dance floor. Is there a connection?  Possibly—the methods of speech scrambling, developed in the 1930s and 1940s primarily by Bell Telephone Laboratories, have been cited as direct ancestors to current pop music. So the next time you use your car GPS receiver to tell you how to get to a restaurant, think of Hedy Lamarr, or better yet, Grandmaster Flash.



[1] US National Security Agency, For Meade, Maryland: “The Start of the Digital Revolution: SIGSALY, Secure Digital Voice Communications in World War II. Undated pamphlet, 19pp. SIGSALY is not an acronym but a nonsense word.

Paul Ceruzzi is chair of the Space History Department at the National Air and Space Museum.

Women in Space

With March upon us, the calls start coming for information about women in space.  March is Women’s History Month and those of us trained as women’s historians know that our topics have particular currency in the third month of the year.  But for women in space, the month to celebrate really should be June.

Valentina Tereshkova

Soviet cosmonaut Valentina Vladmirovna Tereshkova in the spacecraft Vostok 6.

Fifty years ago, on June 16, 1963, the Soviet cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova became the first woman to fly in space. Tereshkova was chosen from a group of five women who had been selected and trained as possible cosmonauts in the Soviet Union.  Her expertise as a skydiver and her personal and family background (her father was a war hero) aided her selection to fly in space.  Launched as the sole occupant of Vostok 6, Tereshkova orbited at the same time as Vostok 5, marking the second time that two human spaceflight vehicles were in space at the same time. Her mission lasted just less than three days (two days, 23 hours, and 12 minutes).

Twenty years later (almost to the day), on June 18, 1983, which is exactly 30 years ago this year, Sally Ride became the first American woman in space aboard the Space Shuttle Challenger (STS-7). She flew with four other crew members on a six-day mission that included launching two communications satellites. After earning her Ph.D. in physics at Stanford University, Ride applied to be an astronaut and was selected in 1978 as a part of the first NASA astronaut candidate class to include women and people of color.  (Five other women also became astronauts in that class: Anna Fisher, Shannon Lucid, Judith Resnik, Rhea Seddon, and Kathryn Sullivan.)  Ride’s distinguished career with NASA included two spaceflights, service on the Rogers Commission after the Challenger disaster in 1986, and founding NASA’s Office of Exploration.

Sally Ride

Sally Ride was the first American woman in space.

Finally, last year, in 2012, again in June (on June 16, exactly 49 years after Tereshkova), Liu Yang became the first female taikonaut to fly into space when she, along with two male crewmates, participated in a thirteen-day mission to dock, both manually and robotically, with China’s prototype space station. As the third nation in the world to launch human beings into orbit, China has flown four crewed missions: its first human mission in 2003, a two-person flight in 2005, its first spacewalk in 2008, and the first crewed orbital docking (in which Liu participated) in 2012. As it did for the Soviet space program in the early 1960s, including a female flyer in a mission drew attention to the program.

Although the inclusion of women in spaceflight is only one part of the broader history of women in aerospace, space travelers serve as the public face of their organizations and thus have symbolic importance in addition to their real contributions.

In the United States, the factors affecting the number of women in space tend to be related to the “pipeline” of experience, schooling, and training required to fulfill those positions.  In the early years of the space race, when astronauts were drawn primarily from the ranks of military-trained jet test pilots, women —who were excluded from military flying from the end of the Women Airforce Service Pilots in 1944 until military flight training was reopened to women in the early 1970s—did not have the military jet test piloting experience to be considered. (A group of talented women pilots did undergo some private astronaut testing in 1960, but the Lovelace Women in Space Program ended abruptly in 1961.) The introduction of the Space Transportation System or “Space Shuttle” also introduced a new type of astronaut: the mission specialists, who were researchers with advanced scientific or technical degrees. The first American women astronaut candidates announced by NASA in 1978 were drawn from an applicant pool that included a greater proportion of women with terminal research degrees (Ph.D.s or M.D.s) than had previously existed.

Although Women’s History Month will be over at the end of March, we will revisit this particular history in June at the Museum. Three curators in Space History are planning an informal series of lunchtime talks, done as a part of the Museum’s weekly “Ask an Expert” series, explaining the history of these women’s achievements. After all, pioneering women deserve attention, even if it is not March.

Margaret A. Weitekamp is a curator in the National Air and Space Museum’s Space History Department.

An Artistic Search for Pluto

How do you illustrate a non-fiction book for kids based on the former ninth planet? Some people still have some pretty strong feelings about Pluto’s demotion: protest signs, student protest speeches, public demonstrations. Cries of unfairness could be heard when news of poor Pluto’s removal from the planetary ranks occurred. It is the intention of this new children’s book to set the story straight or at least attempt to share “Pluto’s side of the story.”

I‘ve worked in the children’s book market as a freelance illustrator for several years in addition to my full-time job with the Museum’s Early Childhood program. My latest book assignment from Abrams Books for Young Readers, Pluto’s Secret: an Icy World’s Tale of Discovery, connected my job as an artist and an educator.

Pluto's Secreet

Pluto’s Secret, An Icy World’s Tale of Discovery, by Margaret A. Weitekamp and David DeVorkin. Illustrated by Diane Kidd.

In publishing, typically the illustrator and the author never meet or exchange ideas. In some cases the author might live across the state or in another country. The approved manuscript is sent to the artist from the publisher. It is then up to the artist to find the visual voice of the text. Fortunately, for this project the authors Margaret Weitekamp and David DeVorkin were my Museum colleagues. In my first sketch, for example, I used my daughter’s old high school algebra homework, which was my interpretation of a possible equation mathematician Percival Lowell might have calculated. David knew right away it was not correct and gave me a copy of an actual Lowell equation which is now in the book. I also needed to re-work my idea of a telescope, which originally looked like one from Dr. Seuss, to one that looked more like Lowell’s telescope.

Telescope

Original draft of the telescope from Pluto’s Secret.

telescope

Revised draft of the telescope, based on David DeVorkin’s comments.

When I work, I use water jars, brushes, water color pads, and tissue paper. I need good lighting and scads of paper towel, and music really helps the flow. Next I usually consider color and composition. In this case, “What color should I make Pluto? Hmmm… Purple? Blue? Meatball brown? Red is taken by Mars.” There is also a lot of activity in space. Things crash into each other, explosions and collisions happen, surfaces have been impacted by objects bumping into them.  Maybe Pluto might have a somewhat bumpy surface with a few craters. What does dirty methane gas look like? An icy world might have a few patches of surface ice. What might life in a Kuiper belt be like? No one really knows exactly, so imagination holds the paint brush.

Pluto

Color sample for Pluto’s Secret, by Diane Kidd

First I sketched out my ideas then sent them to the editor for review and critique, and to Margaret and David for review. Later the publisher sent corrections back marked in red.  The corrected sketches were re-drawn and then re-submitted  to the publisher. Once all the corrected sketches were approved, I worked on re-drawing and painting each image by hand on watercolor paper.

In the past, the procedure of mailing sketches back and forth between the publisher and artist often took weeks to complete. Today sketches can be scanned and sent out and corrections returned within a few days. Once the designer receives the corrected art, he/she can lay out the text copy with finished art work and get a pretty good idea of what the final product will look like. No more mailing tubes or runs to the copy shop in the middle of the night, or trips to the local post office trying to make a deadline.

Nevertheless, I still waited with baited breath for comments from the art editor/publisher/authors as they reviewed the final art work. Did they like it? Did I get the right look? Did they notice that smudge? For me, this is one of the hardest parts of the process, the waiting. Finally, a thumbs up. Everything was approved. It’s a go.

My hope is that young readers and adults alike will have as much fun as I did learning why Pluto is no longer considered a planet and how “he” really feels about it. And I hope you like the book as much as I liked creating the art!

Diane Kidd is manager of the National Air and Space Museum’s Early Childhood Program.

Join us this Friday, March 15, at the Museum in Washington, DC to learn more about Pluto with the authors of Pluto’s Secret. Children can participate in educational activities, and purchase a signed copy of the book.

Chicken Little Was Right

Yes, the sky is falling. The asteroid impact that took place in Chelyabinsk, Russia, on February 15, 2013, has jump-started an international conversation about planetary protection and whether or not there is a really big asteroid/meteor/comet out there with our name on it. There is, we just haven’t found it yet. Miniscule objects enter the atmosphere all the time; occasionally larger objects come down—the Tunguska (1908) and Chelyabinsk (2013) events are prime examples of this—and once in a very great while a mass extinction impact takes place as in the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event of 66-65 million years ago that wiped out the dinosaurs.

chelyabinsk object orbit

The estimated orbit around the Sun of the Chelyabinsk object. It illustrates the orbits of Venus, Mars and Earth, together with the Sun and Earth at impact. The illustration is based on data provided by Dr Peter Brown.

I first heard a scientist talk about this in 1992 when he explained that several thousand interplanetary objects were on collision courses with Earth, and that several small pieces entered the atmosphere every day. It is only a matter of time before a really large one hit the Earth, and the results could be catastrophic. The scientist urged the cataloging of all possible Earth-crossing asteroids, the tracking of their trajectories, and the beginning of research and development on countermeasures to deal with those objects heading for Earth.

Most of the audience departed this speech with mixed feelings, recognizing the reality of what had been said and also denying that it bore any relationship to reality. Indeed, while the scientific theory that a great galactic meteor slamming into the Earth had created a form of “nuclear winter” that made the dinosaurs extinct was gaining currency at the time, few believed a real threat existed in the present. After all, at that time the United States had just achieved the most impressive triumph of its history, defeat of the Soviet Union in the Cold War and stood essentially omnipotent in the world as a superpower. Now another threat is before us: this time it’s from space and there is currently no technology to defeat it.

Now with the Chelyabinsk event as a modern object lesson, there is reason to take seriously the need to mitigate asteroid, comet, or meteor impacts in the future. A major divergence of opinion concerns how the United States should respond to this threat of impact. Most scientists conclude that there is a significant risk and that governments should take some action (especially in searching for Earth-crossing asteroids), but that it is premature to expend enormous amounts of funds for defense systems in the absence of a specifically identified threat. Military leaders argue strongly for a more aggressive approach to asteroid defense. Many assert that the United States must start immediately to develop technology to deflect an object heading for Earth.

This policy debate makes for excellent news stories, and reporting has tended to state the extremes rather than the middle ground that actually dominates. What is taking place is actually quite appropriate for the level of the potential threat to the planet. Efforts are underway to catalog all potentially threatening objects and to strategize on how to prevent cosmic-induced chaos through such means as evacuation or the use of weapons of mass destruction to shift an incoming object’s path away from Earth.

Could viable options be developed to mitigate any threat were it detected years or even decades ahead of time? With that much advance notice, we might be able to reach an asteroid with a robot that could nudge it enough to cause it to miss Earth. Changing the asteroid’s speed by only a small fraction of one mile per hour would be sufficient if action were taken early enough. Some proposed schemes include:

  • Crash a rocket into one side of the asteroid to deflect its course. This plan would be most feasible for asteroids less than about 300 feet wide.
  • Explode a neutron bomb in space at some distance from the asteroid. The explosion would almost instantly heat one side of the asteroid, causing chips of rock to explode away. By the principle of action and reaction, the asteroid would begin to drift slowly in the opposite direction.
  • Land some kind of rocket engine on the surface of the asteroid and operate the engine for several years, pushing the asteroid gently into a new orbit.

Rapid advances in technology in the coming decades may reveal other, better methods that cannot be foreseen for dealing with these possibly threatening objects.

Can human efforts prevent catastrophe from a large asteroid or comet? The answer is yes, if it is detected sufficiently early. A rocket full of (probably nuclear) explosives would have to be launched. One would not try to destroy the object since this would cause it to fragment into pieces leading to an equally destructive “multiple warhead,” much like the case of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 that blasted Jupiter in 1994. Instead, the explosion would need to take place next to the object. This would create a small change in its direction of motion, causing a significant deviation in its orbit over time and distance.

Jupiter

Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 was a comet that broke apart and collided with Jupiter in July 1994. Brown spots mark impact sites on Jupiter’s southern hemisphere.

With current technologies, an Earth-striking asteroid or comet would have to be detected years, perhaps decades, in advance for preventative measures to be effective. The lead time is determined by the size of the object and its trajectory. It is yet to be determined if the technology is sufficient to meet this very real possibility. Concerning this, the late Congressman George Brown stated in 1993: “If some day in the future we discover well in advance that an asteroid that is big enough to cause a mass extinction is going to hit the Earth, and then we alter the course of that asteroid so that it does not hit us, it will be one of the most important accomplishments in all of human history.”

Of course, there is another answer. If we find something coming toward us, we could round up a bunch of oil riggers from the Gulf, put them under the command of Bruce Willis, fly a space shuttle up to rendezvous with the object, plant bombs on it, and blow it up. After all a blockbuster feature film, Armageddon, was based on this premise. For so many reasons this scenario is not an option. It is actually a ridiculous storyline. It is not ridiculous, however, to undertake appropriate steps to mitigate this interplanetary threat. Increasing funding for research and development toward the deployment of countermeasures, as well as all sky surveys to find and track near Earth objects, is an appropriate response.

Roger D. Launius is a senior curator in the National Air and Space Museum’s Department of Space History .

When Worlds Collide

A particularly bright fireball was observed earlier today over a wide area in Russia. Of even greater significance was the very strong sonic boom associated with the passage of the meteor through Earth’s atmosphere.

News out of Russia is reporting that ‘hundreds’ of casualties resulted from people being hit by falling glass, caused by the breaking of windows by the pressure wave associated with the sonic boom. Meteors are quite common around the Earth, but one of this magnitude is fortunately a rare event. The light of the meteor trail that we see in the sky is caused by friction between the incoming fragments and Earth’s atmosphere, which rapidly heats the surface of the fragments to the point that they give off visible light. The intensity of the light is a complex interplay between the speed of the object and the increasing density of the atmosphere as it moves lower into the atmosphere. The sonic boom is a clear indication that the fragments are moving much faster than the speed of sound, and just like jets that exceed the speed of sound, it is the inability of the air molecules to move fast enough to get out of the way of the fast object that generates the shock wave that we hear as a sonic boom. If the shock wave is intense enough, it can break panes of glass, which appears to have been the case today over a large area in Russia.

On June 30, 1908, a rock estimated to about 100 meters (328 feet) in diameter exploded (because of the rapid build-up of pressure as the object got lower into the atmosphere) above the Tunguska region of Siberia, which flattened trees over 2000 square kilometers (800 square miles) and produced a shock wave that knocked people to the ground at a distance of tens of kilometers (tens of miles) from the detonation point.

This image is from the Leonid Kulik expedition in 1927.

Today’s incoming rock likely was quite a bit smaller than the Tunguska rock, although it will take time for Russian scientists to assess what damage has taken place. NASA scientists are confident that the close passage of an asteroid to Earth later today and the trajectory (the flight path) of the Russia meteor were very different, so the two events are not connected, even though they will occur within hours of each other. Both the Russia meteor and the close flyby of an asteroid are reminders that space is not completely empty; whenever Earth happens to cross the path of some solid material in space, whether the size of a sand grain or a large building, the fast-moving objects are going to interact strongly with our atmosphere.

Jim Zimbelman is a geologist in the National Air and Space Museum’s Center for Earth and Planetery Studies