<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mystery of the Massively Parallel Processor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nasm.si.edu/2010/07/02/the-mystery-of-the-massively-parallel-processor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nasm.si.edu/history/the-mystery-of-the-massively-parallel-processor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blog.nasm.si.edu/history/the-mystery-of-the-massively-parallel-processor/comment-page-1/#comment-4513</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nasm.si.edu/?p=1700#comment-4513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a computer scientist and an aviation geek, I&#039;m so glad to see this post on a very important computational architecture. 

Is there any chance that one of the MasPar machines from Goddard wound up in the NASM archives? I&#039;d love to see a post or two about that machine.

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a computer scientist and an aviation geek, I&#8217;m so glad to see this post on a very important computational architecture. </p>
<p>Is there any chance that one of the MasPar machines from Goddard wound up in the NASM archives? I&#8217;d love to see a post or two about that machine.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeked On Goddard</title>
		<link>http://blog.nasm.si.edu/history/the-mystery-of-the-massively-parallel-processor/comment-page-1/#comment-2573</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeked On Goddard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nasm.si.edu/?p=1700#comment-2573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a wonderful little dollop of computing history! I am making some inquiries here at Goddard to see if anybody is still here who worked with the MPP. I would like to write about it on the Geeked On Goddard&quot; science blog. -Dan Pendick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful little dollop of computing history! I am making some inquiries here at Goddard to see if anybody is still here who worked with the MPP. I would like to write about it on the Geeked On Goddard&#8221; science blog. -Dan Pendick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamey</title>
		<link>http://blog.nasm.si.edu/history/the-mystery-of-the-massively-parallel-processor/comment-page-1/#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nasm.si.edu/?p=1700#comment-2382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Current CPUs are a hybrid between classic Von Neumann architecture and massively parallel machines like the MPP.  However, the graphics cards generally are massively parallel.  And Google and such take Sun&#039;s old slogan that &quot;the computer is the network, the network is the computer&quot; and use it to take Massively Parallel to entirely new heights.  In fact, much of the difference is one of scale - how capable the sub-units are, and how fast the interconnections are.

Still, the MPP deserves a lot of recognition, and I&#039;m glad to see it&#039;s getting it, no matter where it&#039;s coming from!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current CPUs are a hybrid between classic Von Neumann architecture and massively parallel machines like the MPP.  However, the graphics cards generally are massively parallel.  And Google and such take Sun&#8217;s old slogan that &#8220;the computer is the network, the network is the computer&#8221; and use it to take Massively Parallel to entirely new heights.  In fact, much of the difference is one of scale &#8211; how capable the sub-units are, and how fast the interconnections are.</p>
<p>Still, the MPP deserves a lot of recognition, and I&#8217;m glad to see it&#8217;s getting it, no matter where it&#8217;s coming from!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: blog.nasm.si.edu @ 2013-05-22 10:25:11 by W3 Total Cache -->